Journal · 2 April 2026

Building a weekly review cadence that survives busy weeks

A review process only helps if it still happens when the market is quiet and when life is loud. We favour short, fixed formats over ambitious journals that get abandoned.

Most traders we meet already own a journal template. Few open it after a flat week. The review process we teach is deliberately short: thirty to forty minutes every Sunday evening, timed before the week’s first London session.

The scorecard has four columns only — setups taken, setups skipped with a valid reason, rules broken, and one sentence on market regime. Anything longer becomes optional homework, not the core habit.

Skipped setups deserve as much ink as filled ones. A clean pass on a marginal signal is evidence that the filter works. Recording skips also reduces the itch to force trades mid-week simply to have something to write about.

When life intervenes, we allow a compressed ten-minute version: list the broken rules, if any, and mark the regime in one word. Continuity beats completeness. A broken streak of missed Sundays is harder to restart than a truncated ritual that still happened.

Pair the written review with one chart replay of a single trade. Replay reveals timing mistakes that a static screenshot hides. Keep the replay under five minutes; the point is clarity, not cinema.

Back to the journal · Ask about a programme